Public Safety Power Shutoff

Share Public Safety Power Shutoff on Facebook Share Public Safety Power Shutoff on Twitter Share Public Safety Power Shutoff on Linkedin Email Public Safety Power Shutoff link
Power outage graphic

The PUC regulates Black Hills Energy and Xcel Energy, which both have Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) plans that have been or could be implemented, impacting consumers. PSPS events have planned outages for customers and may also have other storm-related outages.

PSPS events are implemented in order to reduce the risk of a wildfire caused by power lines or other utility infrastructure. The Public Utilities Commission does not approve or deny Black Hills or Xcel Energy the use of proactive shutoffs; however, the PUC does have an important role in ensuring that the communication, preparation and coordination of PSPS events is protective of customers.

The PUC is creating a new set of rules establishing permanent requirements and standards for public safety power shutoffs. Staff is currently working to draft these rules and welcomes input from Black Hills and Xcel Energy customers on their experiences with the most recent PSPS events. This information will help ensure that the PUC’s rules are comprehensive.

Please take a few minutes to give us your feedback through the survey or comment links below.


Please take a few minutes to give us your feedback through the survey or comment links below.

The PUC regulates Black Hills Energy and Xcel Energy, which both have Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) plans that have been or could be implemented, impacting consumers. PSPS events have planned outages for customers and may also have other storm-related outages.

PSPS events are implemented in order to reduce the risk of a wildfire caused by power lines or other utility infrastructure. The Public Utilities Commission does not approve or deny Black Hills or Xcel Energy the use of proactive shutoffs; however, the PUC does have an important role in ensuring that the communication, preparation and coordination of PSPS events is protective of customers.

The PUC is creating a new set of rules establishing permanent requirements and standards for public safety power shutoffs. Staff is currently working to draft these rules and welcomes input from Black Hills and Xcel Energy customers on their experiences with the most recent PSPS events. This information will help ensure that the PUC’s rules are comprehensive.

Please take a few minutes to give us your feedback through the survey or comment links below.


Please take a few minutes to give us your feedback through the survey or comment links below.

Share Your Experience

Have feedback for the PUC about a recent Public Safety Power Shutoff? Feel free to share here.
Please note: This info will be public for other users to see. 

Thank you for sharing your story with us.

You need to be signed in to share your story.

All fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

  • Share 12/17-12/20 Outage on Facebook Share 12/17-12/20 Outage on Twitter Share 12/17-12/20 Outage on Linkedin Email 12/17-12/20 Outage link

    12/17-12/20 Outage

    by CdP, 3 months ago
    We lost power around 9:30 am Wednesday, 12/17, briefly regained it around 2:30 pm on 12/18 which was actually helpful, then lost it 12/18-12/20.

    We had some high wind gusts and a full-on windy period 12/17 and overnight into 12/18, otherwise, no high winds. Of course, it has been very dry and warm, but this is not unusual or unprecedented for Colorado's climate, nor is wind.

    We are all aware of the tragedy of the Marshall Fire; we are also aware that this is not the norm.

    We lost around $150 of food by being proactive with $200 of ice... Continue reading

  • Share XCEL - 50+ Years of Incompetence on Facebook Share XCEL - 50+ Years of Incompetence on Twitter Share XCEL - 50+ Years of Incompetence on Linkedin Email XCEL - 50+ Years of Incompetence link

    XCEL - 50+ Years of Incompetence

    by PED, 3 months ago

    There is absolutely no justification for the incompetence of Xcel over the past 50+ years in designing and constructing an electrical grid that is incapable of withstanding long-known, routine environmental conditions.

    I have resided in Boulder since late 1967. During the first decade of my residence (1967-1977), we routinely experienced Winter/Spring Chinooks in the 130 MPH range, this was not uncommon. Therefore, for over fifty (50) years, Xcel has constructed electrical supply systems in a known extremely high wind environment. Their current necessity to shut off power due to fire potential from wind damage to their electrical supply system is... Continue reading

  • Share Xcel X-Fails again! on Facebook Share Xcel X-Fails again! on Twitter Share Xcel X-Fails again! on Linkedin Email Xcel X-Fails again! link

    Xcel X-Fails again!

    by PAW, 3 months ago

    Xcel is NOT a public utility company it is FOR PROFIT monopoly. A monopoly BARELY regulated by the PUC! ANY rate increase requested by X-Fail is RUBBER STAMPED by the PUC. I FULLY expect there to be a rate increase request to address the system wide vulnerabilities that X-Fail has allowed exist for decades. It wasn't until the Marshall fire full exposed these vulnerabilities that was anything done. Unfortunately, what was done was to leave our fellow citizens in the dark for DAYS.

    The financial impact of this will stretch into the MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. NONE of which... Continue reading

  • Share Worse than last time on Facebook Share Worse than last time on Twitter Share Worse than last time on Linkedin Email Worse than last time link

    Worse than last time

    by Anna710, 3 months ago

    Xcel has one job. That's it. So why in the world does Xcel think it's ok to just cut off power?! Why does this ridiculous "strategy" actually have a name?! Xcel has been allowed to have a monopoly, so the state has allowed them to come up with whatever crazy "plan" they want to utilize in order to continue to make huge amounts of money.

    They're an enormously profitable monopoly, and they have been given free rein. Of course they will do things that help them remain incredibly profitable. Apparently they must be forced to spend money to upgrade equipment... Continue reading

  • Share Public safety demands fixing infrastructure on Facebook Share Public safety demands fixing infrastructure on Twitter Share Public safety demands fixing infrastructure on Linkedin Email Public safety demands fixing infrastructure link

    Public safety demands fixing infrastructure

    by MKR, 3 months ago

    PSPS cannot be come the norm - Xcel fixing their infrastructure must be prioritized.

    My family was privileged that we could afford to go drop $1K on a generator along with $150 in propane and $50 in ice. We lost around $200 in food by the time we could get the generator in place. I am grateful it was warm because we have 3 small children including an 8 month old baby and with our gas fireplace and gas stove could maintain enough home heat and hot water to get by, but if it had been colder we would have... Continue reading

  • Share Shame on Xcel and Colorado on Facebook Share Shame on Xcel and Colorado on Twitter Share Shame on Xcel and Colorado on Linkedin Email Shame on Xcel and Colorado link

    Shame on Xcel and Colorado

    by Phil-golden-33, 3 months ago

    Let me be clear at the outset: I fully support mitigating natural disasters—especially wildfires—whenever and wherever possible. Public safety must always come first. That said, the way this recent power shutoff was executed was deeply mismanaged and remarkably tone-deaf on Xcel’s part.


    It’s hard to ignore the broader context. This outage felt less like a carefully planned safety measure and more like a political pressure tactic following the state’s settlement related to the Marshall Fire. With the state unwilling to assume future fire risk, Xcel appears to be protecting itself by shifting the burden to customers. While I can understand... Continue reading

  • Share “What we have here is a failure to communicate.” on Facebook Share “What we have here is a failure to communicate.” on Twitter Share “What we have here is a failure to communicate.” on Linkedin Email “What we have here is a failure to communicate.” link

    “What we have here is a failure to communicate.”

    by JPM, 3 months ago

    We can all agree we don’t like wildfires. But what’s the reasonable response to the threat? It can’t be to shut down the power whenever the wind blows.

    After the last/first Public Safety Power Shutoff (2024), the PUC insisted that Xcel better communicate with its customers. The recent double voluntary PSPS outages shows that Xcel learned little and has done little.

    With little regard for its customers, Xcel sticks its head in the sand. It has neither built the infrastructure needed or developed the communication skills to keep the public updated.

    What’s missing?

    First, there is no reliable information about... Continue reading

  • Share Xcel communications have gotten WORSE in Dec. 2025 compared with Apr. 2024 on Facebook Share Xcel communications have gotten WORSE in Dec. 2025 compared with Apr. 2024 on Twitter Share Xcel communications have gotten WORSE in Dec. 2025 compared with Apr. 2024 on Linkedin Email Xcel communications have gotten WORSE in Dec. 2025 compared with Apr. 2024 link

    Xcel communications have gotten WORSE in Dec. 2025 compared with Apr. 2024

    by cchapman, 3 months ago
    Let me start this story with the week BEFORE the week of the Dec. 2025 PSPS. On Dec. 9th we got multiple messages from Xcel about a power outage that we did NOT have. On Dec. 11th we got 4 phone calls from Xcel in the middle of the night about another power outage they said we had, but did NOT, which kept us awake. So the next day I talked with an Xcel tech about a possible system error that was assigning homes to the wrong Xcel power circuits. He promised an "investigation" and that I would be sent... Continue reading
  • Share Inadequate response by Excel for restoration on Facebook Share Inadequate response by Excel for restoration on Twitter Share Inadequate response by Excel for restoration on Linkedin Email Inadequate response by Excel for restoration link

    Inadequate response by Excel for restoration

    by PatD, 3 months ago

    Having lived in Fl for most of my life I have experienced numerous loss of power incidents due to storms. The big difference between those and these PSPS is the response to restoring power. In hurricane prone areas, power companies from all over the US send trucks and crews ahead of time and are staged to begin working on power restoration asap. The response is massive and noticeable. Here there was virtually no response other than from the local crews, grossly inadequate to restore power to thousands of customers in a short time period. We saw no Excel trucks in... Continue reading

  • Share Neighbor in Longmont on Facebook Share Neighbor in Longmont on Twitter Share Neighbor in Longmont on Linkedin Email Neighbor in Longmont link

    Neighbor in Longmont

    by TraceV, 3 months ago

    I'm a neighbor that lives in Longmont, where I have municipal utilities and experienced exactly zero seconds of power disruption from the same two days of wind storms (my trash can certainly went on a short journey though.)


    In following the coverage of the wind storm I found out that Xcel energy has posted around $7 billion in profits since 2021. Meanwhile they have been claiming it's prohibitively expensive, to the tune of hundreds of millions, to modernize our infrastructure.


    From my perspective it looks a lot like Xcel energy has been pocketing the money intended for maintenance while asking... Continue reading

Page last updated: 09 Mar 2026, 10:38 AM