Developer not audited between plans and "as built"

The developer of my district did a very poor job of laying out landscaping responsibilities and also tied irrigation systems billed to the district to areas not belonging to it including the City of Aurora, Cherry Creek School District, an apartment complex and some individual homes too. When the developer left control of the board, the new volunteer home owners received very little information about what the district owned and has spent several years trying to sort things out and correct past mistakes.

Cities that approve districts formation should audit the "as built" to verify that the district only "pays for what it owns", and not anything else.