Request for review of 9.9 Rate hike and separate wildfire fees on Residential bill

I understand utility costs rise with inflation, materials, and infrastructure needs. However, if Xcel is recovering wildfire mitigation or other expenses through separate adjustments—like the $34.33 back-charge and $6.14 current fee on my January 28, 2026 bill—those should offset any increase in base delivery rates, not add to them. Otherwise, customers pay twice for the same service: once for electricity, once for upkeep. The proposed 9.9% electric rate increase in August 2026 compounds this issue—especially when Colorado inflation is only 2.6%. That disparity feels disproportionate without clear proof the hike is essential, not simply profit protection in a monopoly market where we have no alternative. Please require Xcel to demonstrate these charges are justified, non-duplicative, and necessary—without shifting their budgeting shortfalls onto ratepayers.